Mark Tibbs v. Gregg Hershberger

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999510092-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02340-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999514158]. Mailed to: Mark Tibbs. [14-7332]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7332 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7332 MARK TIBBS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; LIEUTENANT DICKENS; J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Commissioner; SCOTT OAKLEY, Exec. Dir.; WILLIAM E. MAYCOCK; GARY MAYNARD, Sec’y; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; RANDALL WATSON, Director for Programs and Services; CAPTAIN WALTER HOLMES, Defendants – Appellees, and DANIEL M. LONG, Judge, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-02340-JKB) Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 14-7332 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Mark Tibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-7332 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Mark Tibbs appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the We have Accordingly, district court. Tibbs v. Hershberger, No. 1:13-cv-02340-JKB (D. Md. filed Aug. 8, 2014; entered Aug. 11, 2014). relief is denied. facts and materials legal before Tibbs’ motion for injunctive We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?