Mark Tibbs v. Gregg Hershberger
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for injunctive relief pending appeal (FRAP 8) [999510092-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-02340-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999514158]. Mailed to: Mark Tibbs. [14-7332]
Appeal: 14-7332
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7332
MARK TIBBS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GREGG HERSHBERGER, Warden; LIEUTENANT DICKENS; J. MICHAEL
STOUFFER, Commissioner; SCOTT OAKLEY, Exec. Dir.; WILLIAM E.
MAYCOCK; GARY MAYNARD, Sec’y; KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden;
RANDALL WATSON, Director for Programs and Services; CAPTAIN
WALTER HOLMES,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
DANIEL M. LONG, Judge,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02340-JKB)
Submitted:
January 15, 2015
Decided:
January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Appeal: 14-7332
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Mark Tibbs, Appellant Pro Se.
Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7332
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Mark Tibbs appeals the district court’s order denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
We
have
Accordingly,
district
court.
Tibbs v. Hershberger, No. 1:13-cv-02340-JKB (D. Md. filed Aug.
8, 2014; entered Aug. 11, 2014).
relief is denied.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Tibbs’ motion for injunctive
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?