US v. David Barren

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530049]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7356]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7356 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7356 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID BARREN, Hutchins, a/k/a James Willie Jones, a/k/a Vincent Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Barren, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Assistant United States Attorney, Seema Mittal, Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7356 Doc: 12 Filed: 02/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: David Barren appeals the district court’s dismissing several motions made in his criminal case. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm the district court’s order. order We have Accordingly, United States v. Barren, No. 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?