US v. David Barren
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530049]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7356]
Appeal: 14-7356
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/18/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7356
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID BARREN,
Hutchins,
a/k/a
James
Willie
Jones,
a/k/a
Vincent
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Barren, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, Assistant
United States Attorney, Seema Mittal, Charles Joseph Peters,
Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7356
Doc: 12
Filed: 02/18/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David
Barren
appeals
the
district
court’s
dismissing several motions made in his criminal case.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we affirm the district court’s order.
order
We have
Accordingly,
United States v. Barren,
No. 8:08-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md. Aug. 28, 2014).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?