Herbert Robinson v. Gina Jarrell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02321-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999514124]. [14-7364]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7364 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7364 HERBERT #27925, ALONZO ROBINSON, formerly SCDC #211603, #143203, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. GINA JARRELL, Nurse, all in their individual capacities; ROSITA R. THOMAS, Nurse, all in their individual capacities; PAMELA C. DERRICK, Nurse, all in their individual capacities; MR. ROWE, Commissary Personnel, all in their individual capacities; JOHN AND JANE DOES, all in their individual capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:13-cv-02321-RBH) Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Trey M. Nicolette, Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg, South Carolina, for Appellees. Appeal: 14-7364 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-7364 Doc: 13 Filed: 01/21/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson Aug. 20, 2014). facts and materials legal before v. We Jarrell, dispense No. with 8:13-cv-02321-RBH oral argument contentions are adequately this and argument court because presented would (D.S.C. not the in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?