Herbert Robinson v. Gina Jarrell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02321-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999514124]. [14-7364]
Appeal: 14-7364
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7364
HERBERT
#27925,
ALONZO
ROBINSON,
formerly
SCDC
#211603,
#143203,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GINA JARRELL, Nurse, all in their individual capacities;
ROSITA
R.
THOMAS,
Nurse,
all
in
their
individual
capacities; PAMELA C. DERRICK, Nurse, all in their
individual capacities; MR. ROWE, Commissary Personnel, all
in their individual capacities; JOHN AND JANE DOES, all in
their individual capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(8:13-cv-02321-RBH)
Submitted:
January 15, 2015
Decided:
January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Alonzo Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Trey M. Nicolette,
Michael Charles Tanner, MICHAEL C. TANNER LAW OFFICE, Bamberg,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Appeal: 14-7364
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7364
Doc: 13
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Herbert Alonzo Robinson appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Robinson
Aug. 20,
2014).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
v.
We
Jarrell,
dispense
No.
with
8:13-cv-02321-RBH
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
because
presented
would
(D.S.C.
not
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?