US v. Jeffrey Prysock

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1,7:14-cv-02908-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999645651]. Mailed to: Jeffrey Prysock. [14-7374]

Appeal: 14-7374

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/24/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7374

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY GRANT PRYSOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1; 7:14-cv-02908-HMH)

Submitted:

August 20, 2015

Decided:

August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Grant Prysock,
Assistant United States
for Appellee.

Appellant
Attorney,

Pro Se. Leesa Washington,
Greenville, South Carolina,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7374

Doc: 7

Filed: 08/24/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Grant Prysock appeals the district court’s order
construing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28
U.S.C.

§ 2255

jurisdiction.

(2012)
We

motion

have

and

reviewed

dismissing
the

it

record

for
and

lack

of

find

no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by

the

district

court.

7:11-cr-00171-HMH-1;

United

States

7:14-cv-02908-HMH

2014; entered July 22, 2014).

v.

(D.S.C.

Prysock,
filed

July

Nos.
21,

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2