Charles Humphries, Jr. v. Jimmy Ashe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999465056-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00066-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549008]. Mailed to: Humphries. [14-7387]
Appeal: 14-7387
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7387
CHARLES EDWARD HUMPHRIES, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JIMMY ASHE, Jackson County, NC Sheriff; C.B. HOOPER, Jackson
County Sheriff’s Department Deputy & Supervisor of Work
Crew; MATT HELTON, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department
Lieutenant;
SHEILA
AIKEN,
Jackson
County
Sheriff’s
Department
Lieutenant;
BRIAN
WELLMON,
Jackson
County
Sheriff’s Department Sergeant; DEWEESE, Jackson County
Sheriff’s Department Medical Provider,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City.
Robert J. Conrad,
Jr., District Judge. (2:12-cv-00066-RJC)
Submitted:
February 27, 2015
Decided:
March 19, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Edward Humphries, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7387
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Edward Humphries, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without
prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we deny his motion to appoint counsel and affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Humphries v.
Ashe,
4,
2014).
facts
and
legal
materials
before
No.
dispense
2:12-cv-00066-RJC
with
contentions
are
oral
(W.D.N.C.
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
Sept.
the
the
We
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?