Charles Humphries, Jr. v. Jimmy Ashe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999465056-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00066-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549008]. Mailed to: Humphries. [14-7387]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7387 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7387 CHARLES EDWARD HUMPHRIES, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JIMMY ASHE, Jackson County, NC Sheriff; C.B. HOOPER, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department Deputy & Supervisor of Work Crew; MATT HELTON, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department Lieutenant; SHEILA AIKEN, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department Lieutenant; BRIAN WELLMON, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department Sergeant; DEWEESE, Jackson County Sheriff’s Department Medical Provider, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (2:12-cv-00066-RJC) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015 Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Edward Humphries, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7387 Doc: 14 Filed: 03/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Charles Edward Humphries, Jr. appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we deny his motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Humphries v. Ashe, 4, 2014). facts and legal materials before No. dispense 2:12-cv-00066-RJC with contentions are oral (W.D.N.C. argument adequately because presented in Sept. the the We this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?