Aaron Roberts v. Warren Pruitt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999458480-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03604-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999517788]. Mailed to: Roberts. [14-7392]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7392 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/27/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7392 AARON B. ROBERTS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARREN PRUITT, Case Manager; KEVIN GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Secretary, BROWN, Case Manager; Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03604-GLR) Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015 Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron B. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7392 Doc: 12 Filed: 01/27/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Aaron B. Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his Defendants action motion summary against for appointment judgment them. on his Roberts has appointment of counsel on appeal. and find no reversible error. motion for appointment court’s order. and materials counsel 42 U.S.C. also filed and granting § 1983 a (2012) motion for We have reviewed the record Accordingly, we deny Roberts’ counsel and affirm the district Roberts v. Pruitt, No. 1:13-cv-03604-GLR (D. Md. Aug. 20, 2014). facts of of legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?