Aaron Roberts v. Warren Pruitt
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999458480-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03604-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999517788]. Mailed to: Roberts. [14-7392]
Appeal: 14-7392
Doc: 12
Filed: 01/27/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7392
AARON B. ROBERTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARREN PRUITT, Case Manager; KEVIN
GREGG L. HERSHBERGER, Secretary,
BROWN,
Case
Manager;
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03604-GLR)
Submitted:
January 22, 2015
Decided:
January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron B. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se.
Dorianne Avery Meloy,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7392
Doc: 12
Filed: 01/27/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Aaron B. Roberts appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
Defendants
action
motion
summary
against
for
appointment
judgment
them.
on
his
Roberts
has
appointment of counsel on appeal.
and find no reversible error.
motion
for
appointment
court’s order.
and
materials
counsel
42
U.S.C.
also
filed
and
granting
§ 1983
a
(2012)
motion
for
We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we deny Roberts’
counsel
and
affirm
the
district
Roberts v. Pruitt, No. 1:13-cv-03604-GLR (D. Md.
Aug. 20, 2014).
facts
of
of
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?