US v. David Roy
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999457391-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9,3:14-cv-00602-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999645674].. [14-7406]
Appeal: 14-7406
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/24/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7406
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH)
Submitted:
August 20, 2015
Decided:
August 24, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Ray Roy, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Stephen
David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7406
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/24/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
David Ray Roy appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as a
successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Roy,
Nos. 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 28,
2014).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?