US v. David Roy

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999457391-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9,3:14-cv-00602-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999645674].. [14-7406]

Appeal: 14-7406

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/24/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7406

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
DAVID RAY ROY, a/k/a Pooh,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH)

Submitted:

August 20, 2015

Decided:

August 24, 2015

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Ray Roy, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Stephen
David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7406

Doc: 10

Filed: 08/24/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David Ray Roy appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, after construing it as a
successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.

United States v. Roy,

Nos. 3:06-cr-00340-HDH-9; 3:14-cv-00602-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 28,
2014).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2