Raymond Edward Chestnut v. Toni McCoy
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999477590-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999458266-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-01814-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999631060]. Mailed to: Chestnut. [14-7411]
Appeal: 14-7411
Doc: 26
Filed: 07/30/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7411
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TONI MCCOY, correctional officer, individual capacity,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-01814-RBH)
Submitted:
July 1, 2015
Decided:
July 30, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, II,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7411
Doc: 26
Filed: 07/30/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). *
We
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Chestnut v. McCoy, No. 1:13-cv-01814-RBH (D.S.C. Aug.
20, 2014).
denied.
legal
before
Chestnut’s motions for appointment of counsel are
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation as modified to reflect that the action is
deemed a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (2012) due to
its frivolousness.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?