Brandon Roberts v. Christopher McKenzie
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-02474-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999543499]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7412]
Appeal: 14-7412
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7412
BRANDON ROBERTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CHRISTOPHER
MCKENZIE,
CO
II;
MICHAEL
J.
STOUFFER,
Commissioner; JOHN ROWLEY, Former Warden; JUSTIN ADAM, CO
II; BRADLEY WILT, Lieutenant; THOMAS DORCUN, CO II,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2, CO II,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:12-cv-02474-DKC)
Submitted:
February 27, 2015
Decided:
March 11, 2015
Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Appeal: 14-7412
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7412
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/11/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying
his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district
court’s
judgment
complaint.
error.
dismissing
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-DKC (D.
Md. Aug. 18, 2014).
facts
his
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?