Brandon Roberts v. Christopher McKenzie

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-02474-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999543499]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7412]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7412 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7412 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CHRISTOPHER MCKENZIE, CO II; MICHAEL J. STOUFFER, Commissioner; JOHN ROWLEY, Former Warden; JUSTIN ADAM, CO II; BRADLEY WILT, Lieutenant; THOMAS DORCUN, CO II, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN DOE 1; JOHN DOE 2, CO II, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-02474-DKC) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 11, 2015 Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Dorianne Avery Meloy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Appeal: 14-7412 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-7412 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/11/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Brandon Roberts appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s judgment complaint. error. dismissing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Roberts v. McKenzie, No. 8:12-cv-02474-DKC (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2014). facts his and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?