US v. Dickinson Adionser
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999509166-2], Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999444945-2]; terminating Motion to proceed under CJA [999453695-2] Originating case number: 2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Dickinson Norman Adionser. [14-7417]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, a/k/a D.C. Black,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1)
June 26, 2015
July 7, 2015
Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James
Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions to recuse and compel.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v.
Adionser, No. 2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2014).
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?