US v. Dickinson Adionser


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999509166-2], Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999444945-2]; terminating Motion to proceed under CJA [999453695-2] Originating case number: 2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999615547]. Mailed to: Dickinson Norman Adionser. [14-7417]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7417 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/07/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7417 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, a/k/a D.C. Black, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1) Submitted: June 26, 2015 Decided: July 7, 2015 Before MOTZ and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se. Darryl James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7417 Doc: 23 Filed: 07/07/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to recuse and compel. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Adionser, No. 2:03-cr-00081-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 9, 2014). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?