Michael Chew v. Kathleen Green

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999498689-2], denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999473690-2] Originating case number: 8:13-cv-02115-DKC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999517860]. Mailed to: Chew. [14-7437]

Appeal: 14-7437

Doc: 21

Filed: 01/27/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7437

MICHAEL CHEW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; JAMES TICHNELL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PAUL
WISENGOFF;
GREGORY
BIRCH;
BRUCE
BOZMAN;
DENISE
GELSINGER;
SCOTT
ROWE,
Correctional
Case
Management
Specialist; HAMILTON, Gang Intel,
Defendants,
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02115-DKC)

Submitted:

January 22, 2015

Decided:

Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

January 27, 2015

Appeal: 14-7437

Doc: 21

Filed: 01/27/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Michael Chew, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE
OT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-7437

Doc: 21

Filed: 01/27/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

Chew

the

PER CURIAM:
Michael

appeals

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we deny Chew’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Chew

v. Gatewood, No. 8:13-cv-02115-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2014).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3