Brandon Roberts v. North Branch Facility

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03765-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999555906]. Mailed to: Brandon Roberts. [14-7442]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7442 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7442 BRANDON ROBERTS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NORTH BRANCH FACILITY; WARDEN BOBBY P. SHEARIN; M. YACENECH, Acting Chief of Security; KEITH K. ARNOLD, Chief of Security, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03765-ELH) Submitted: March 20, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7442 Doc: 12 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Brandon Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for discovery in this action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012). over final This court may exercise jurisdiction only orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). is neither a final order The order Roberts seeks to appeal nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and materials legal before contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?