Brandon Roberts v. North Branch Facility
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-03765-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999555906]. Mailed to: Brandon Roberts. [14-7442]
Appeal: 14-7442
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7442
BRANDON ROBERTS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTH BRANCH FACILITY; WARDEN BOBBY P. SHEARIN; M.
YACENECH, Acting Chief of Security; KEITH K. ARNOLD, Chief
of Security,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-03765-ELH)
Submitted:
March 20, 2015
Decided:
March 31, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood,
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7442
Doc: 12
Filed: 03/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s order
denying his motion for discovery in this action filed under 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012).
over
final
This court may exercise jurisdiction only
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1291
(2012),
and
certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
is
neither
a
final
order
The order Roberts seeks to appeal
nor
an
appealable
interlocutory
or
collateral order.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack
of jurisdiction.
We dispense with oral argument because the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?