Robert Funches v. City of Petersburg, VA Circuit

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999464282-2]; denying Motion to extend filing time [999464280-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [999461295-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999461218-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00819-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999555837]. Mailed to: Robert Funches. [14-7446]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7446 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7446 ROBERT L. FUNCHES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CITY OF PETERSBURG, VA CIRCUIT COURT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:13-cv-00819-HEH) Submitted: February 20, 2015 Decided: March 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert L. Funches, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7446 Doc: 19 Filed: 03/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert dismissing L. Funches his 42 appeals U.S.C. the § 1983 district (2012) court’s order complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we affirm for the reasons stated by the Accordingly, district court. Funches v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:13-cv-00819-HEH (E.D. Va. Sept. 4, 2014). amend his We deny Funches’s motions to appoint counsel, complaint, extend the filing deadline to file additional briefs, and for a transcript at government expense. We dispense contentions with are oral argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?