Robert Funches v. City of Petersburg, VA Circuit
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999464282-2]; denying Motion to extend filing time [999464280-2]; denying Motion to amend/correct [999461295-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999461218-2] Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00819-HEH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999555837]. Mailed to: Robert Funches. [14-7446]
Appeal: 14-7446
Doc: 19
Filed: 03/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7446
ROBERT L. FUNCHES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CITY OF PETERSBURG, VA CIRCUIT COURT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:13-cv-00819-HEH)
Submitted:
February 20, 2015
Decided:
March 31, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Funches, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7446
Doc: 19
Filed: 03/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert
dismissing
L.
Funches
his
42
appeals
U.S.C.
the
§ 1983
district
(2012)
court’s
order
complaint
without
prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012).
We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
affirm
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
Accordingly,
district
court.
Funches v. City of Petersburg, No. 3:13-cv-00819-HEH (E.D. Va.
Sept. 4, 2014).
amend
his
We deny Funches’s motions to appoint counsel,
complaint,
extend
the
filing
deadline
to
file
additional briefs, and for a transcript at government expense.
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?