Torrence Crouell, Sr. v. Sergeant Reed
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03239-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999529985]. Mailed to: Crouell. [14-7451]
Appeal: 14-7451
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/18/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7451
TORRENCE D. CROUELL, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SGT. REED; C/O FOUNTAIN; ASST. SUPT. F.
LIEUTENANT,
TAYLOR; FEMALE
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03239-BO)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Torrence D. Crouell, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7451
Doc: 10
Filed: 02/18/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Torrence D. Crouell, Sr., appeals the district court’s
orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint,
and denying his motion to amend his complaint.
the record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court.
Crouell v. Reed,
No. 5:13-ct-03239-BO (E.D.N.C. June 2, 2014; Sept. 15, 2014).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?