US v. James Niblock

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:02-cr-00568-GBL-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530007]. Mailed to: James Niblock. [14-7460]

Appeal: 14-7460

Doc: 15

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7460

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMES R. NIBLOCK,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (1:02-cr-00568-GBL-1)

Submitted:

February 12, 2015

Decided:

February 18, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James R. Niblock, Appellant Pro Se.
Dana James Boente, Acting
United States Attorney, William P. Jauquet, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7460

Doc: 15

Filed: 02/18/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
James R. Niblock appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for a writ of error coram nobis in which he
alleged that his conviction for wire fraud is no longer valid in
light of United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332 (4th Cir.
2012), which addressed proper venue for wire fraud prosecutions.
We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in
the district court’s denial of the writ.

See United States v.

Akinsade, 686 F.3d 248, 251-52 (4th Cir. 2012) (providing review
standard).
We

dispense

contentions

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
with
are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2