US v. Warren Newell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cr-00022-MR-DLH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999513950]. Mailed to: Warren Newell and attorney Richard Cassady. [14-7461]

Appeal: 14-7461

Doc: 5

Filed: 01/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7461

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WARREN ROSSLYN NEWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:14-cr-00022-MR-DLH-1)

Submitted:

January 15, 2015

Decided:

January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Warren Rosslyn Newell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Richard Ascik,
Richard Lee Edwards, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7461

Doc: 5

Filed: 01/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Warren

Rosslyn

Newell

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying without prejudice his motion to recover personal
property.

See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g).

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
to

appeal

is

neither

a

final

interlocutory or collateral order.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

order

The order Newell seeks
nor

an

appealable

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2