Enrique Gomez v. Russell Perdue
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999458203-2]. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999496979]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7464]
Appeal: 14-7464
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2014
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7464
ENRIQUE GOMEZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of FCI Gilmer,
Respondent – Appellee,
and
ERIC HOLDER, U.S. Attorney General; DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNKNOWN U.S.D.O.J.
OFFICIALS,
Respondents.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK)
Submitted:
December 16, 2014
Before DUNCAN
Circuit Judge.
and
DIAZ,
Circuit
Decided: December 19, 2014
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Enrique Gomez-Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se.
Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney,
Helen Campbell
Wheeling, West
Appeal: 14-7464
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2014
Pg: 2 of 3
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7464
Doc: 10
Filed: 12/19/2014
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Enrique
court’s
order
district
Gomez,
magistrate
(2012)
judge
and
petition.
reversible
error.
a
federal
accepting
denying
We
have
the
relief
reviewed
Accordingly,
prisoner,
appeals
recommendation
on
his
the
although
28
record
we
of
U.S.C.
and
grant
the
the
§ 2241
find
no
leave
to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Gomez v. Perdue, No. 2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK
(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 23, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?