Enrique Gomez v. Russell Perdue

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999458203-2]. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999496979]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7464]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7464 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2014 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7464 ENRIQUE GOMEZ, Petitioner - Appellant, v. RUSSELL A. PERDUE, Warden of FCI Gilmer, Respondent – Appellee, and ERIC HOLDER, U.S. Attorney General; DIRECTOR OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DIRECTOR OF BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNKNOWN U.S.D.O.J. OFFICIALS, Respondents. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK) Submitted: December 16, 2014 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Circuit Decided: December 19, 2014 Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Enrique Gomez-Rodriguez, Appellant Pro Se. Altmeyer, Assistant United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Wheeling, West Appeal: 14-7464 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2014 Pg: 2 of 3 Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 14-7464 Doc: 10 Filed: 12/19/2014 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Enrique court’s order district Gomez, magistrate (2012) judge and petition. reversible error. a federal accepting denying We have the relief reviewed Accordingly, prisoner, appeals recommendation on his the although 28 record we of U.S.C. and grant the the § 2241 find no leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gomez v. Perdue, No. 2:14-cv-00019-JPB-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?