Adrian Bacon v. C. Rose
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999459313-2]. Originating case number: 7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999530828]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7475]
Appeal: 14-7475
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7475
ADRIAN NATHANIEL BACON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER C. ROSE,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
PAUL PAYNE; J. MCQUINN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
James P. Jones, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Nathaniel Bacon, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7475
Doc: 16
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian
order
denying
court’s
judge
order
and
his
motion
accepting
denying
complaint.
error.
Nathaniel
Bacon
for
the
relief
appeals
the
appointment
of
recommendation
on
Bacon’s
42
district
counsel
of
U.S.C.
the
court’s
and
the
magistrate
§ 1983
(2012)
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly,
we
deny
Bacon’s
pending
motion
for
appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Va.
May
1,
Bacon v. Rose, No. 7:13-cv-00350-JPJ-PMS (W.D.
2014;
Sept.
10,
2014).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?