Kevin Reilly v. Larry Cartledge
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999468799-2] Originating case number: 0:12-cv-03503-SB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999514055]. Mailed to: Kevin Reilly. [14-7482]
Appeal: 14-7482
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7482
KEVIN A. REILLY,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
LARRY CARTLEDGE, Warden of Perry Correctional Institute,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (0:12-cv-03503-SB)
Submitted:
January 15, 2015
Decided:
January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin A.
Assistant
Assistant
Appellee.
Reilly, Appellant
Attorney
General,
Attorney General,
Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr.,
Donald
John
Zelenka,
Senior
Columbia, South Carolina, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7482
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Kevin A. Reilly seeks to appeal the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition.
The
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
a
certificate
(2012).
of
appealability.
28
U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(A)
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
relief
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
court’s
debatable
or
a
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
When the district court denies
Slack
satisfies
jurists
this
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
standard
find
constitutional
529
U.S.
by
that
the
claims
is
473,
484
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
Slack, 529 U.S.
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude
that Reilly has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we
deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
2
Appeal: 14-7482
Doc: 7
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 3 of 3
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?