Ronald Legg v. Chief Rhode

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999466193-2] Originating case number: 4:12-cv-00811-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999557039]. Mailed to: Ronald Legg. [14-7489]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7489 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/01/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7489 RONALD L. LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHIEF RHODES, of Horry County Police; DET. NEIL FREBOWITZ, of Horry County Police; EDWARD ED CHRISCO, Public Defender; W. THOMAS FLOYD, Public Defender, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge. (4:12-cv-00811-RMG) Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: April 1, 2015 Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald L. Legg, Appellant Pro Se. Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II, WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7489 Doc: 14 Filed: 04/01/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald L. Legg appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. we deny Legg’s motion for appointment of counsel We have Accordingly, and affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court’s orders. Legg v. Rhodes, No. 4:12-cv-00811-RMG (D.S.C. June 11, 2012, Aug. 6, 2013 & Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?