Ronald Legg v. Chief Rhode
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999466193-2] Originating case number: 4:12-cv-00811-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999557039]. Mailed to: Ronald Legg. [14-7489]
Appeal: 14-7489
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/01/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7489
RONALD L. LEGG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHIEF RHODES, of Horry County Police; DET. NEIL FREBOWITZ,
of Horry County Police; EDWARD ED CHRISCO, Public Defender;
W. THOMAS FLOYD, Public Defender,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(4:12-cv-00811-RMG)
Submitted:
February 27, 2015
Decided:
April 1, 2015
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald L. Legg, Appellant Pro Se.
Edgar Lloyd Willcox, II,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7489
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/01/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald L. Legg appeals the district court’s orders denying
relief
on
his
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
(2012)
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
we
deny
Legg’s
motion
for
appointment
of
counsel
We
have
Accordingly,
and
affirm
substantially on the reasoning of the district court’s orders.
Legg v. Rhodes, No. 4:12-cv-00811-RMG (D.S.C. June 11, 2012,
Aug. 6, 2013 & Oct. 1, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?