David Hill v. Harvie Wilkinson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-DEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999534037]. Mailed to David Hill. [14-7500]

Appeal: 14-7500

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/24/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7500

DAVID E. HILL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARVIE WILKINSON, Chief Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, U.S.
Circuit Judge; MICHAEL, U.S. Circuit Judge; WIDENER, U.S.
Circuit Judge; DIANA G. MOTZ, U.S. Circuit Judge; ROBERT B.
KING, U.S. Circuit Judge; DENNIS W. SHEDD, U.S. Circuit
Judge; T. S. ELLIS, III, U.S. District Judge; CLAUDE M.
HILTON, U.S. District Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-DEM)

Submitted:

February 18, 2015

Decided:

February 24, 2015

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7500

Doc: 10

Filed: 02/24/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his

Bivens

v.

Six

Unknown

Named

Agents

of

Fed.

Bureau

of

Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action without prejudice, and
the

court’s

subsequent

order

denying

Hill’s

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment and to amend his
complaint.
error.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

See Hill v. Wilkinson, No. 2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-

DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014 & Sept. 22, 2014).

We dispense with

oral

contentions

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

and

materials

legal
before

this

court

are
and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2