Keith Godwin v. Harold Clarke

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999513953]. Mailed to: Godwin. [14-7534]

Appeal: 14-7534

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7534

KEITH EARL GODWIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director; ROBERT F. HALEY, II, Commonwealth
Attorney; CHESAPEAKE CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted:

January 15, 2015

Decided:

January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Earl Godwin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7534

Doc: 12

Filed: 01/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Keith Earl Godwin appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012).
error.
district
(E.D. Va.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.
Sept.

Godwin
25,

v.

2014).

Clarke,
We

No.

dispense

2:13-cv-00691-RAJ-TEM
with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2