William Watts, II v. United State
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-02659-TMC-JDA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999513966]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7542]
Appeal: 14-7542
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7542
WILLIAM T. WATTS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES; FBI; UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-02659-TMC-JDA)
Submitted:
January 15, 2015
Decided:
January 21, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Watts, II, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,
Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7542
Doc: 10
Filed: 01/21/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William T. Watts, II, seeks to appeal the district
court’s
order
adopting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge and dismissing some but not all of his claims in an action
filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and the Freedom of
Information
Act,
5
U.S.C.
§§ 551-52
(2012).
This
court
may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2012),
and
28 U.S.C.
certain
§ 1292
interlocutory
(2012);
Fed.
R.
and
Civ.
collateral
P.
54(b);
orders.
Cohen
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
v.
The
order Watts seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
Accordingly, we
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?