Frank Neff v. Sergeant Steven

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999484311-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00718-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549117]. Mailed to: Frank Neff. [14-7548]

Appeal: 14-7548

Doc: 13

Filed: 03/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7548

FRANK MICHAEL NEFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT STEVEN; CHAPLAIN HANCOCK; WARDEN; SERGEANT GATES;
SERGEANT HAASI; LIEUTENANT ELLIOTT,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PRISON,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00718-RDB)

Submitted:

March 17, 2015

Decided:

March 19, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank M. Neff, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7548

Doc: 13

Filed: 03/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Frank

Michael

Neff

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

We

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Neff v. Steven, No. 1:14-cv-00718-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 10,

2014).

We deny Neff’s motion in which he requests that the

court not dismiss his case, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2