Rodney David Young v. South Carolina Department
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02247-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Young. [14-7608]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
RODNEY DAVID YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
PATRICK; CAPTAIN WRIGHT; OFFICER SABRINA RISHER; OFFICER
SERGEANT GREEN; WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
March 31, 2015
April 2, 2015
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
As to Young’s
proceeding, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
Young v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.
1:14-cv-02247-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2014).
Young has forfeited
appellate review of his remaining claims by failing to raise
them in his informal brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?