Rodney David Young v. South Carolina Department

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:14-cv-02247-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999557845]. Mailed to: Young. [14-7608]

Appeal: 14-7608

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/02/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7608

RODNEY DAVID YOUNG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT
OF
CORRECTIONS;
LIEUTENANT
PATRICK; CAPTAIN WRIGHT; OFFICER SABRINA RISHER; OFFICER
JEFFREY
MOSLEY;
MS.
VALERIE
JACKSON;
MS.
J.
BROWN;
SERGEANT GREEN; WARDEN LEVERN COHEN, et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02247-TMC)

Submitted:

March 31, 2015

Decided:

April 2, 2015

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney David Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7608

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/02/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Rodney

David

Young

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
claim

challenging

the

propriety

of

his

As to Young’s

prison

disciplinary

proceeding, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Young v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No.

1:14-cv-02247-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 14, 2014).

Young has forfeited

appellate review of his remaining claims by failing to raise
them in his informal brief.

See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2