Anton Johnson v. Amy Phenix
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03312-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549063]. Mailed to: Anton Johnson. [14-7612]
Appeal: 14-7612
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7612
ANTON JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AMY PHENIX,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03312-BO)
Submitted:
March 17, 2015
Decided:
March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anton Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Patrick Edgerton, Francis
Lachicotte Zemp, Jr., ROBERTS & STEVENS, PA, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7612
Doc: 14
Filed: 03/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Anton Johnson appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his civil action for failure to state a claim.
P. 12(b)(6).
error.
See Fed. R. Civ.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
district
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
court.
Johnson
(E.D.N.C. Oct. 9, 2014).
v.
Phenix,
No.
5:13-ct-03312-BO
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?