Minyard Davis v. David Simon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530855]. Mailed to: Minyard Davis. [14-7614]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7614 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7614 MINYARD CASS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID SIMONS; T. D. HATCHETT; COPELAND; LEROY SUTTON, I. SAWYERS; M. FOLTZ; F. Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Minyard Cass Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7614 Doc: 20 Filed: 02/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Davis v. Simons, No. 2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va. Oct. 1, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Davis also claims the district court erred by not granting a preliminary injunction against Defendant prison officials. Because we affirm the district court’s decision on the merits in this respect, we conclude that the appeal from the effective denial of preliminary relief is moot. See Univ. of Tex. v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981); Dex Media West Inc. v. City of Seattle, 696 F.3d 952, 956 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012); Cedar Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir. 1977). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?