Minyard Davis v. David Simon
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530855]. Mailed to: Minyard Davis. [14-7614]
Appeal: 14-7614
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7614
MINYARD CASS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID SIMONS; T. D. HATCHETT;
COPELAND; LEROY SUTTON,
I.
SAWYERS;
M.
FOLTZ;
F.
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minyard Cass Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7614
Doc: 20
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. *
Davis v. Simons, No. 2:14-cv-00069-RAJ-DEM (E.D. Va.
Oct. 1, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
*
Davis also claims the district court erred by not granting
a preliminary injunction against Defendant prison officials.
Because we affirm the district court’s decision on the merits in
this respect, we conclude that the appeal from the effective
denial of preliminary relief is moot.
See Univ. of Tex. v.
Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981); Dex Media West Inc. v. City
of Seattle, 696 F.3d 952, 956 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012); Cedar Coal
Co. v. United Mine Workers, 560 F.2d 1153, 1161-62 (4th Cir.
1977).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?