William Watts, II v. Unknown Officer
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-03223-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530877]. Mailed to: Watts. [14-7633]
Appeal: 14-7633
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7633
WILLIAM T. WATTS, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNKNOWN OFFICER, of Lexington County Sheriff’s Department;
UNKNOWN SLED OFFICERS; UNKNOWN US MILITARY; FBI; JOHN
ETTERS; CRAIG HALL; OFFICER SHUMPERT; OFFICER SINGLETON;
JAMES METTS; LEWIS MCCARTY; COMMISSIONER OF SLED, Sheriff,
Head, Leader; GOVERNOR NIKKI HALEY; UNITED STATES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson.
Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-03223-TMC)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Watts, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7633
Doc: 8
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William
T.
Watts,
II,
appeals
the
district
court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing
his
complaint
under
Bivens
v.
Six
Unknown
Named
Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), as
frivolous and malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012).
error.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court.
Watts v. Unknown Officer, No. 8:14-cv-03223-TMC
(D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?