Mark Corrigan v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00070-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999537571]. Mailed to: Corrigan. [14-7653]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7653 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/02/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7653 MARK CORRIGAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00070-GMG-RWT) Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 2, 2015 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark R. Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7653 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/02/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mark Corrigan filed a civil action petitioning for a writ of error coram nobis conviction and sentence. adopting in part the to overturn his 1998 criminal He appeals the district court’s order magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing the petition without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corrigan v. United States, No. 3:14-cv- 00070-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?