Mark Corrigan v. US
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00070-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999537571]. Mailed to: Corrigan. [14-7653]
Appeal: 14-7653
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/02/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7653
MARK CORRIGAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg.
Gina M. Groh,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00070-GMG-RWT)
Submitted:
February 25, 2015
Decided:
March 2, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark R. Corrigan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7653
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/02/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Mark Corrigan filed a civil action petitioning for a
writ
of
error
coram
nobis
conviction and sentence.
adopting
in
part
the
to
overturn
his
1998
criminal
He appeals the district court’s order
magistrate
judge’s
recommendation
and
dismissing the petition without prejudice for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Corrigan v. United States, No. 3:14-cv-
00070-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?