Kevin Snodgrass, Jr. v. Harold Clark

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00257-GEC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999569472]. Mailed to: Snodgrass. [14-7671]

Appeal: 14-7671

Doc: 17

Filed: 04/22/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7671

KEVIN SNODGRASS, JR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
UHURU SEKOU OBATAIYE-ALLAH,
Plaintiff,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARK, Director, DOC; GERALD K. WASHINGTON,
Regional Director; R. MATHENA, Warden; JOHN WALRATH,
Assistant
Warden;
SHORTRIDGE,
Operations
Officer;
J.
GALLIHAR, Major; J. MCQUEEN, Investigator; CCS, Central
Classification Services; SWINNEY, Unit Manager; KILBOURNE,
Unit Manager; SERGEANT HALL, Sergeant; SERGEANT INGLE; L. T.
MULLINS, Lieutenant; PAYNE, Lieutenant; J. MESSER, Grievance
Coordinator; R. MULLINS, Grievance Coordinator; J. OWENS,
Property; VANOVER, Property; I.H.O. L. MULLINS, Hearings
Officer; SERGEANT SYKES, Sergeant; C/O R. BROWN; C/O
VANOVER; C/O CARTER; C/O MESSER; C/O OFFICER MESSER; C/O
SHEPPARD; C/O DUPIE; C/O
SLUSS; C/O AKERS; C/O
GIBSON;
JOHN DOES; JANE DOES; L. T. LAMBERT, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT
BLEVINS; LIEUTENANT LYLE; SERGEANT HILL; YOUNCE, Unit
Manager; SERGEANT BARTON; SERGEANT MILLER,
Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Glen E. Conrad, Chief
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00257-GEC)

Submitted:

April 13, 2015

Decided:

April 22, 2015

Appeal: 14-7671

Doc: 17

Filed: 04/22/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-7671

Doc: 17

Filed: 04/22/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Kevin Snodgrass, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders
(1)

dismissing

this

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

action

without

prejudice for failure to comply with a court order; and (2)
denying
counsel.
error.

his

motions

for

reconsideration

and

appointment

of

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

Snodgrass v. Clark, No. 7:14-cv-00257-GEC (W.D.

Va. July 1 & Aug. 11, 2014).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3