Charles Williams v. Josh Christenson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:14-ct-03089-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999531001]. Mailed to: Charles A. Williams. [14-7711]
Appeal: 14-7711
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7711
CHARLES A. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSH CHRISTENSON, Harnett County Sheriff's Office; WILLIAM
COATS, Angier Police Department; ADAM DUNN, Johnston County
Sheriff's Office; JEFFREY CANADY, Johnston County Sheriff's
Office,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:14-ct-03089-F)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7711
Doc: 14
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
confine
our
brief.
review
to
the
See
challenge
4th
Cir.
R.
in
his
informal
issues
34(b).
brief
raised
in
Because
the
On appeal, we
the
Appellant’s
Williams
basis
for
does
the
not
district
court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the
court’s
order.
judgment.
legal
before
Accordingly,
we
affirm
the
district
court’s
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?