Robert Johnson v. Jay Vannoy

Filing

AMENDED OPINION filed amending and superseding opinion dated 03/02/2015. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for rehearing [999545841-2]; denying request for appointment of counsel. Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00055-FDW. Copies to all parties. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7712]

Appeal: 14-7712

Doc: 31

Filed: 05/29/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

ON REHEARING
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7712

ROBERT W. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAY VANNOY;
BRICKER,

DAVID

B.

FREEDMAN;

TOM

E.

HORNE;

LEIGH

C.

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (5:14-cv-00055-FDW)

Submitted:

May 19, 2015

Decided:

May 29, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7712

Doc: 31

Filed: 05/29/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Robert
dismissing

W.
his

Johnson
42

appeals

U.S.C.

the

§ 1983

district

suit

as

a

petition

for

panel

rehearing.

order

frivolous.

previously dismissed this appeal as untimely.
filed

court’s

We

Johnson has now

Upon

review

of

the

petition, we grant panel rehearing and affirm.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in
the

Appellant’s

brief.

See

4th

Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because

Johnson’s informal briefs do not challenge the basis for the
district
review

court’s
of

the

disposition,
court’s

order.

district court’s judgment.
appointment of counsel.

Johnson

has

forfeited

Accordingly,

we

appellate

affirm

the

We also deny Johnson’s motion for

We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials

before

this

court

and

argument

would

not

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2