US v. Antonio Mosley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00336-MOC-1,3:14-cv-00399-MOC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999531155]. Mailed to: Antonio Mosley. [14-7723]
Appeal: 14-7723
Doc: 7
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7723
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:11-cr-00336-MOC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-MOC)
Submitted:
February 12, 2015
Decided:
February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Mosley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant
United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7723
Doc: 7
Filed: 02/19/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Mosley seeks to appeal the district court’s
orders denying the respondent’s motions for an extension of time
and denying Mosley’s motion to recuse.
This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
seeks
to
appeal
are
neither
final
interlocutory or collateral orders.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The orders Mosley
orders
nor
appealable
Accordingly, we dismiss the
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?