Kenneth Awe v. George Hinkle

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:14-cv-00178-JLK-RSB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999530905]. Mailed to: Kenneth Awe. [14-7737]

Appeal: 14-7737

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/19/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7737

KENNETH VALENTINE AWE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GEORGE HINKLE, VDOC Regional Administrator; ROSP
MATHENA, Warden; ROSP ASS/WARDEN WALRATH, A/Warden,

WARDEN

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:14-cv-00178-JLK-RSB)

Submitted:

February 12, 2015

Decided:

February 19, 2015

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth V. Awe, Appellant Pro Se. Kate Elizabeth Dwyre, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7737

Doc: 8

Filed: 02/19/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kenneth

V.

Awe

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in Awe’s 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action.

On appeal, we confine our review

to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
34(b).

Because

Awe’s

informal

brief

does

See 4th Cir. R.

not

challenge

the

basis for the district court’s disposition, Awe has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2