Milford Washington v. Michael Reed
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999568097-2] Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00644-RBS-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999658280]. Mailed to: Milford Washington. [14-7760]
Appeal: 14-7760
Doc: 32
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7760
MILFORD WASHINGTON, a/k/a Tessuma Nuballa,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL R. REED; PATRICK GURNEY; LOUIS CEI; DANIEL MAHON;
DAVID ROBINSON; MS. TAYLOR; MS. BEST,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00644-RBS-TEM)
Submitted:
September 9, 2015
Decided:
September 11, 2015
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Milford Washington, Appellant Pro Se.
Kate Elizabeth Dwyre,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7760
Doc: 32
Filed: 09/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Milford
Washington
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order ruling on several discovery and miscellaneous motions, and
has
filed
a
motion
to
remand.
This
court
may
exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and
certain
interlocutory
and
collateral
orders,
28
U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545–46 (1949).
seeks
to
appeal
is
neither
a
final
interlocutory or collateral order.
motion
to
jurisdiction.
remand
and
dismiss
The order Washington
order
nor
an
appealable
Accordingly, we deny the
the
appeal
for
lack
of
We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?