US v. Jerrell Thoma

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999573097]. Mailed to: Jerrell Thomas. [14-7775]

Appeal: 14-7775

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7775

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JERRELL ANTONIO THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (2:94-cr-00069-RGD-3)

Submitted:

April 14, 2015

Decided:

April 28, 2015

Before KEENAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Kevin Michael
Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7775

Doc: 9

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jerrell Antonio Thomas appeals the district court’s order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion in which Thomas
sought a reduction in his sentence based on Amendments 750 and
782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
record and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court.

United States v.

Thomas, No. 2:94-cr-00069-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2014).
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2