Dorel Pickett v. M. Rawl

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999571922]. Mailed to: appellant. [14-7779]

Appeal: 14-7779

Doc: 8

Filed: 04/27/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7779

DOREL PICKETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY M. RAWLS, 71 Sussex S. D.; LIEUTENANT BANTY, Sussex
Lieutenant; DEPUTY CHERRY, Sussex Deputy,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM)

Submitted:

April 23, 2015

Decided: April 27, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dorel Pickett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7779

Doc: 8

Filed: 04/27/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dorel Pickett appeals the district court’s order denying
relief

on

his

42

U.S.C.

§ 1983

(2012)

complaint.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
v. Rawls, No. 2:14-cv-00278-AWA-DEM
We

dispense

contentions

with
are

oral

argument

adequately

Pickett

(E.D. Va. Nov. 10, 2014).

because

presented

have

in

the

facts

and

the

materials

legal
before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2