US v. Delano Boothe

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999573117]. Mailed to: Delano Boothe. [14-7797]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7797 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/28/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7797 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DELANO BOOTHE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-9) Submitted: April 23, 2015 Decided: April 28, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Delano Boothe, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7797 Doc: 12 Filed: 04/28/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Delano Boothe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). reversible error. (4th Cir. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193 Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Boothe, No. 4:09-cr- 00063-RBS-TEM-9 (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?