US v. Delano Boothe
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-9 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999573117]. Mailed to: Delano Boothe. [14-7797]
Appeal: 14-7797
Doc: 12
Filed: 04/28/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7797
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DELANO BOOTHE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Rebecca Beach Smith,
Chief District Judge. (4:09-cr-00063-RBS-TEM-9)
Submitted:
April 23, 2015
Decided:
April 28, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Delano Boothe, Appellant Pro Se.
Howard Jacob Zlotnick,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7797
Doc: 12
Filed: 04/28/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Delano Boothe appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012).
reversible error.
(4th Cir. 2013).
We have reviewed the record and find no
See United States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
United States v. Boothe, No. 4:09-cr-
00063-RBS-TEM-9 (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2014).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?