James Price v. Karen Hogsten
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999509771-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00646. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999580728]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7821]
Appeal: 14-7821
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/11/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7821
JAMES DENNIS PRICE,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KAREN HOGSTEN, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00646)
Submitted:
April 30, 2015
Decided:
May 11, 2015
Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Dennis Price, Appellant Pro Se. John Fulton Gianola,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7821
Doc: 10
Filed: 05/11/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James
district
Dennis
court’s
magistrate
(2012)
Price,
judge
order
petition.
and
reversible error.
a
accepting
denying
We
federal
have
prisoner,
the
relief
recommendation
on
reviewed
appeals
his
the
28
of
U.S.C.
record
and
the
the
§ 2241
find
no
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
Price v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-00646 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27,
2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?