James Price v. Karen Hogsten

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999509771-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00646. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999580728]. Mailed to: Appellant. [14-7821]

Download PDF
Appeal: 14-7821 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/11/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7821 JAMES DENNIS PRICE, Petitioner – Appellant, v. KAREN HOGSTEN, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00646) Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 11, 2015 Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Dennis Price, Appellant Pro Se. John Fulton Gianola, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 14-7821 Doc: 10 Filed: 05/11/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James district Dennis court’s magistrate (2012) Price, judge order petition. and reversible error. a accepting denying We federal have prisoner, the relief recommendation on reviewed appeals his the 28 of U.S.C. record and the the § 2241 find no Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Price v. Hogsten, No. 1:12-cv-00646 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 27, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal before contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?