Daniel King v. Charles Ratledge

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999517268-2] Originating case number: 5:14-hc-02038-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999550153]. Mailed to: Daniel King. [14-7837]

Appeal: 14-7837

Doc: 10

Filed: 03/20/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7837

DANIEL H. KING,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES RATLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (5:14-hc-02038-FL)

Submitted:

March 17, 2015

Decided:

March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel H. King, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7837

Doc: 10

Filed: 03/20/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Daniel H. King, a federal prisoner,
court’s

order

petition.
error.

denying

relief

on

his

28

appeals the district
U.S.C.

§ 2241

(2012)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma

pauperis,

we

affirm

for

the

reasons

stated

by

the

district

court.

King v. Ratledge, No. 5:14-hc-02038-FL (E.D.N.C. Dec. 3,

2014).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal
before

contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2