Larnell Hendrick v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:14-cv-02544-TDC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999564817]. Mailed to: Larnell Hendrick. [14-7852]
Appeal: 14-7852
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/15/2015
Pg: 1 of 4
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7852
LARNELL HENDRICK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC.; FRANK B. BISHOP, NBCI Warden,
In their individual and Official Capacities; LIEUTENANT
SAWYERS, In their individual and Official Capacities;
SERGEANT G. FORNEY, In their individual and Official
Capacities; CO II SOLTAS, In their individual and Official
Capacities; CO II ANDERSON, In their individual and
Official Capacities; BILL BEEMAN, NBCI Medical Director, In
their individual and Official Capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-02544-TDC)
Submitted:
April 13, 2015
Decided:
April 15, 2015
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam
opinion.
Larnell Hendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS,
RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland, for Appellees.
Appeal: 14-7852
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/15/2015
Pg: 2 of 4
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 14-7852
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/15/2015
Pg: 3 of 4
PER CURIAM:
Larnell
Hendrick
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order: denying his motions for preliminary injunction and for
appointment of counsel; and granting his motions to correct the
record
and
to
(2012) action.
We
amend
the
complaint
in
this
42
U.S.C.
§ 1983
We affirm in part and dismiss in part.
review
the
denial
of
a
motion
injunction for abuse of discretion.
for
a
preliminary
WV Ass’n of Club Owners &
Fraternal Servs., Inc. v. Musgrave, 553 F.3d 292, 298 (4th Cir.
2009).
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in finding that Hendrick failed to make the showing
required
for
Winter v.
(2008).
issuance
Natural
of
Res.
a
Def.
preliminary
Council,
injunction.
Inc.,
555
See
U.S.
7,
20
We therefore affirm the portion of the district court’s
order denying the requested injunction for the reasons stated by
the district court.
Hendrick v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.,
No. 8:14-cv-02544-TDC (D. Md. Nov. 21, 2014).
With
order,
respect
this
to
court
may
the
remainder
exercise
of
the
jurisdiction
district
only
court’s
over
final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral
orders,
54(b); Cohen
v.
545-46 (1949).
28
U.S.C.
Beneficial
§ 1292
Indus.
(2012);
Loan
Fed.
Corp.,
337
R.
Civ.
U.S.
P.
541,
The non-dispositive orders denying the motion
for appointment of counsel and granting the motions to amend the
3
Appeal: 14-7852
Doc: 17
Filed: 04/15/2015
Pg: 4 of 4
complaint and to correct the record are neither final orders nor
appealable interlocutory or collateral orders.
Accordingly, we
dismiss this portion of the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED IN PART;
DISMISSED IN PART
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?