US v. Alvita Gunn
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for bail/release pending appeal (Local Rule 9(a) and (b)) [999503518-2], updating certificate of appealability status Originating case number: 8:09-cr-00213-RWT-4,8:14-cv-00167-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999572926]. Mailed to: Alvita Karen Gunn. [14-7871]
Appeal: 14-7871
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/28/2015
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7871
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ALVITA KAREN GUNN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge.
(8:09-cr-00213-RWT-4; 8:14-cv-00167-RWT)
Submitted:
April 23, 2015
Decided:
April 28, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvita Karen Gunn, Appellant Pro Se. Bryan E. Foreman, Lindsay
Eyler Kaplan, Christen Anne Sproule, Assistant United States
Attorneys, Adam Kenneth Ake, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7871
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/28/2015
Pg: 2 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Alvita
Karen
Gunn
seeks
to
appeal
the
district
court’s
order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion.
The
order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues
a
certificate
(2012).
of
appealability.
28
U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1)(B)
A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012).
relief
on
the
demonstrating
district
merits,
that
court’s
debatable
or
a
When the district court denies
prisoner
reasonable
assessment
wrong.
Slack
satisfies
jurists
this
would
of
the
v.
McDaniel,
standard
find
U.S.
that
the
claims
constitutional
529
by
is
473,
484
(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003).
When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the
prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural
ruling
is
debatable,
and
that
the
motion
states
claim of the denial of a constitutional right.
a
debatable
Slack, 529 U.S.
at 484-85.
We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
Gunn has not made the requisite showing.
Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability, deny Gunn’s motion for bail or
release pending appeal, and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
2
Appeal: 14-7871
Doc: 11
adequately
Filed: 04/28/2015
presented
in
the
Pg: 3 of 3
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?