Stanley Lee Moultrie v. William Byars, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:14-cv-01690-DCN-BM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999572927]. Mailed to: Moultrie. [14-7873]

Appeal: 14-7873

Doc: 12

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7873

STANLEY LEE MOULTRIE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM BYARS, JR., South Carolina Department of Corrections
Director; BRYAN P STIRLING; DEPUTY DIRECTOR ROBERT WARD;
SCDC
GENERAL
COUNSEL
DAYNE
HAILE;
ASSOCIATE
WARDEN
MCFADDEN; MAJOR C WEST; CHRISTOPHER D. FLORIAN; BETHEA LT
MICHAEL TOMS; ANN HALLMAN, Agency Grievance Coordinator; MS
GRAVES, ECI Grievance Coordinator; MARIA LEGGINS, Agency
Mailroom Coordinator; LT JAMES MARTIN; WILLIE L. EAGLETON,
Evan Warden; SGT H
SIMS; MS. BAKER, Mailroom Coordinator;
PAMELA MCDOWELL, Mailroom Supervisor; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
BUSH, Lee CI; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
NOLAN; ASSOCIATE WARDEN
DEAN; K RIVERS, Lee CI Grievance Coordinator; JIMMY SLEIGH;
DEPUTY WARDEN; LT JACK BROWN; MS CONYERS, Lee CI Officer;
GENERAL COUNSEL
TATARSKY; DEPUTY DIRECTOR MCCALL; AMY
SMITH; D
EASTRIDGE; FELICIA MCQUEEN; SANDRA BOWIE; DEPUTY
WARDEN
DAVIS; CAPTAIN MR. THOMAS; MS. WILSON; GOVERNOR
NIKKI HALEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL ALAN WILSON,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bristow Marchant, Magistrate
Judge. (9:14-cv-01690-DCN-BM)

Submitted:

April 23, 2015

Decided:

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

April 28, 2015

Appeal: 14-7873

Doc: 12

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Lee Moultrie, Appellant Pro Se.
Jerome Scott Kozacki,
WILLCOX BUYCK & WILLIAMS, PA, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 14-7873

Doc: 12

Filed: 04/28/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Stanley Lee Moultrie seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s
text

orders

denying

his

motion

to

amend

denying his motion for reconsideration.

his

complaint

and

This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012),
and

certain

interlocutory

and

collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
seeks

to

appeal

are

neither

final

interlocutory or collateral orders.
appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

The orders Moultrie

orders

nor

appealable

Accordingly, we dismiss the

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED

3