US v. Antonio Goode

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:08-cr-01253-TLW-1,4:12-cv-02326-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999663515]. Mailed to: Antonio Thomas Goode. [14-7903]

Appeal: 14-7903

Doc: 11

Filed: 09/21/2015

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7903

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTONIO THOMAS GOODE,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (4:08-cr-01253-TLW-1; 4:12-cv-02326-TLW)

Submitted:

August 13, 2015

Decided:

September 21, 2015

Before KING, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Thomas Goode, Appellant Pro Se. Arthur Bradley Parham,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina;
Stanley D. Ragsdale, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia,
South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 14-7903

Doc: 11

Filed: 09/21/2015

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Antonio

Thomas

Goode

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

denying the second post-judgment motion Goode filed in his 28
U.S.C. § 2255

(2012)

proceeding.

On

appeal,

we

confine

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because

Goode’s

informal

brief

our

See 4th
does

not

challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Goode
has

forfeited

Accordingly,
dispense

we

with

contentions

are

appellate
affirm
oral

review

the

district

argument

adequately

of

the
court’s

because

presented

court’s

in

the
the

order.

judgment.

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2