Eddie Taylor v. Dennis Daniel
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999528391-2] Originating case number: 5:13-ct-03080-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999547150]. Mailed to: Eddie Taylor. [14-7911]
Appeal: 14-7911
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/17/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7911
EDDIE LEVORD TAYLOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DENNIS DANIELS; NURSE GARRISON; NURSE DANIELS; NURSE CURTIS;
MARVIN CASINO; NURSE DANIAL; NURSE GRESSNER; MR.
BURGESS;
MR. BURCH; MR.
SMITH; OFFICER MCCRORY; OFFICER TAYLOR;
OFFICER PURVISH; OFFICER MCLEAN; OFFICER NEUHOFF; OFFICER
STEVENS; OFFICER MERCER; SERGEANT ARTHUR; SERGEANT ELLIS;
SERGEANT ANDRAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-ct-03080-BO)
Submitted:
March 12, 2015
Decided:
March 17, 2015
Before GREGORY, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Levord Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
Judith Marie Estevez,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Ginger
Bagley Hunsucker, CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh,
North
Carolina;
Donna
Elizabeth
Tanner,
NORTH
CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 14-7911
Doc: 16
Filed: 03/17/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Eddie
denying
relief
Levord
his
on
Taylor
motions
his
42
for
U.S.C.
appeals
the
appointment
§ 1983
district
of
(2012)
court’s
counsel
and
complaint.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
orders
denying
We
have
Accordingly,
we deny Taylor’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Taylor v. Daniels, No.
5:13-ct-03080-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 24, 2013; May 2, 2014; Dec. 19,
2014).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?