Alvia Lacy v. National Railroad Passenger Co

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999521834-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00179-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999568515]. Mailed to: Chowdhry, Lacy. [15-1013]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1013 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/21/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1013 ALVIA L. LACY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. NATIONAL TAYLOR, RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, Amtrak; LARRY Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00179-RDB) Submitted: April 16, 2015 Decided: April 21, 2015 Before AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alvia L. Lacy, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. Delany, Andrew George Sakallaris, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1013 Doc: 15 Filed: 04/21/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alvia L. Lacy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012), and 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e (2012). have reviewed the record Accordingly, although pauperis, affirm court. we we for and grant the find no reversible leave to proceed reasons stated by the We error. in forma district Lacy v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., No. 1:14-cv-00179- RDB (D. Md. Dec. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?