Chesapeake Bay Enterprise, Inc v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitt

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00633-HEH, 12-30347-BFK, 13-03073-BFK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999617560]. [15-1021]

Appeal: 15-1021

Doc: 22

Filed: 07/09/2015

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1021

CHESAPEAKE BAY ENTERPRISE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellant,
v.
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP,
Third Party Defendant – Appellee,
and
REGIONS BANK,
Third Party Defendant,
CHESAPEAKE TRUST,
Plaintiff.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:14-cv-00633-HEH)

Submitted:

June 29, 2015

Decided:

July 9, 2015

Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Appeal: 15-1021

Doc: 22

Filed: 07/09/2015

Pg: 2 of 3

Steven S. Biss, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant.
Jack
McKay, Patrick Potter, Dania Slim, PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN
LLP, Washington, D.C, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 15-1021

Doc: 22

Filed: 07/09/2015

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Chesapeake Bay Enterprise, Inc., appeals the district court’s
order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary
judgment in favor of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, on
Chesapeake Bay’s claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty and
conversion.
well

as

the

We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as
parties’

briefs,

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Chesapeake Bay Enter., Inc. v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw

Pittman LLP, No. 3:14-cv-00633-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2014).

We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3