Chesapeake Bay Enterprise, Inc v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pitt


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:14-cv-00633-HEH, 12-30347-BFK, 13-03073-BFK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999617560]. [15-1021]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1021 Doc: 22 Filed: 07/09/2015 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1021 CHESAPEAKE BAY ENTERPRISE, INC., Defendant - Appellant, v. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, Third Party Defendant – Appellee, and REGIONS BANK, Third Party Defendant, CHESAPEAKE TRUST, Plaintiff. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:14-cv-00633-HEH) Submitted: June 29, 2015 Decided: July 9, 2015 Before AGEE and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 15-1021 Doc: 22 Filed: 07/09/2015 Pg: 2 of 3 Steven S. Biss, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Jack McKay, Patrick Potter, Dania Slim, PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP, Washington, D.C, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 15-1021 Doc: 22 Filed: 07/09/2015 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Chesapeake Bay Enterprise, Inc., appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, on Chesapeake Bay’s claims asserting breach of fiduciary duty and conversion. well as the We have reviewed the record included on appeal, as parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chesapeake Bay Enter., Inc. v. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, No. 3:14-cv-00633-HEH (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?