Karen Jackson v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999511972-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-00870-SAG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999594264]. Mailed to: Karen Jackson. [15-1038]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1038 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/02/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1038 KAREN D. JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:14-cv-00870-SAG) Submitted: May 29, 2015 Decided: June 2, 2015 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen D. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Irene Cole, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1038 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/02/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Karen D. Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s * order upholding the Commissioner’s denial of Jackson’s application for supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, no reversible error. although we grant Jackson leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v. Colvin, No. 1:14-cv-00870-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?