In re: Tadarian Neal
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999521799-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999544831-2]. Originating case numbers: 3:09-cr-00017-FDW-DCK-1, 3:13-cv-00215-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999631850]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [15-1043]
Appeal: 15-1043
Doc: 16
Filed: 07/31/2015
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-1043
In Re: TADARIAN RESHAWN NEAL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:09-cr-00017-FDW-DCK-1; 3:13-cv-00215-FDW)
Submitted:
June 26, 2015
Decided:
July 31, 2015
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tadarian Reshawn Neal, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 15-1043
Doc: 16
Filed: 07/31/2015
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Tadarian Reshawn Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on
his motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012).
He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act.
We
conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in
the district court.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?