In re: Tadarian Neal


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999521799-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999544831-2]. Originating case numbers: 3:09-cr-00017-FDW-DCK-1, 3:13-cv-00215-FDW. Copies to all parties and the district court. [999631850]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [15-1043]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1043 Doc: 16 Filed: 07/31/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1043 In Re: TADARIAN RESHAWN NEAL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:09-cr-00017-FDW-DCK-1; 3:13-cv-00215-FDW) Submitted: June 26, 2015 Decided: July 31, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tadarian Reshawn Neal, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1043 Doc: 16 Filed: 07/31/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Tadarian Reshawn Neal petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed ruling on his motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2012). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?