Robert Broughton, Jr. v. John McClain, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999529169-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00454-H Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999584875].. [15-1045]

Download PDF
Appeal: 15-1045 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/18/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1045 ROBERT B. BROUGHTON, JR.; CELESTE G. BROUGHTON, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. JOHN N. MCCLAIN, JR.; ROBERT GALEY; WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:13-cv-00454-H) Submitted: May 13, 2015 Decided: May 18, 2015 Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert B. Broughton, Jr., Celeste G. Broughton, Appellants Pro Se. William Sidney Aldridge, NICHOLLS & CRAMPTON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Debbie Weston Harden, WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 15-1045 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/18/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert B. Broughton, Jr. and Celeste G. Broughton appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for sanctions. We have reviewed Accordingly, we the deny record leave and to find proceed no in reversible forma error. pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Broughton 2014). legal before v. McClain, No. 5:13-cv-00454-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 10, We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?